After negotiations that the town of San Giovanni Valdarno decided to Terranova Bracciolini with regards to the use of € 300,000, the committee "victims of the landfill Podere Rota, on several occasions, expressed dissatisfaction and complaints about the mayor's decision Viligiardi. Personally I'm not here to write to praise the action of the mayor, but because I was repeatedly called into question as a person and as a counselor, seeing that I do not mean negligence attributed to pass quietly, although he has already tried to explain my positions repeatedly I think it is time to write in to make them clear and appropriate to give the opportunity for those who want to replicate.
First of all I thank those who voted, but who should remember that an adviser has decision-making right, the decision, ultimately, is the vote of the entire city council, which in its entirety only has power to direct and control, and not to block the expansion of the landfill, to shut them down or build a new road to divert traffic. It is also important to understand what are the real powers that the law grants to municipalities and other local authorities, for example, in the area of \u200b\u200bthe City Farm Rota is responsible for Newfoundland, and not that of St. John, are within the municipal boundaries of Newfoundland, and not in those of St. John. A grant or deny the extension is not, therefore, the council or the city council of St. John, but is the responsibility of the Provincial Government, after evaluation of the services within the conference. So, as far as I can, as a counselor, I suggest that "advice" to the council and the mayor, as do my colleagues, but this does not imply their acceptance. Another task I perform, always together with others, is to try mediation, an agreement that is shared as much as possible on subjects in which non-uniform cross visions: the comparison and, moreover, sometimes the conflict are part of the game, but in the end if there were not sharing in the majority would mean that there are difficulties to govern.
The situation is different for the directors, in their sole person, serve two functions: to advise and to head the group. These are faced almost exclusively with themselves and thus may decide a little 'what they want, especially if they are part of the opposition. It's really too easy to stand in opposition guardians of the interests of citizens at times, between the benches Opposition councilors can be found in the previous legislature, sat in the majority, or even come in and then did not display precisely the current positions. I can not understand the easy demagoguery and, to confess, I prefer the concreteness made by small steps, because the promises of everything and now I have learned to distrust, and especially those who have come to say: "In six months, than a year there will be a new road "winds there are desired, or" When they start work on the landfill part of the cycle "twenty-three years have passed. I can not accept all those who, without knowing the suffering of those who has lived a life next to the landfill, without having very clear alternatives and viable solutions, it is possible to create illusions or expectations demagogic.
Finally, I clarify that I joined the city council for the Moat, Riofi, Santa Maria (in Newfoundland): I did my fights publicly by the city and continue to do so if not closely linked to a committee, but I will not mix these with my role as director of St. John for whom I have elected, a role that involves not only deal with matters of Santa Maria, but the entire City .
That said, I come to the crux of the debate, namely the choice of mayor Viligiardi about 300,000 € and the fact that I have adhered to this choice. So, I believe the council Tarchi made a couple of appeals to the judiciary: the first contested the fact that the City Council, opposing the approval of the ego-state waste, the police were from the Region, through the appointment of a Commissioner ad acta (the mayor of Arezzo), which approved on behalf of our municipality, the state itself. The appeal was lost. The second appeal was against the increase from forty-seven to eighty-two € cost per ton of waste, subject because Municipality uncomfortable. The judiciary, like all you know, ruled in favor of the City of St. John, but the landfill CSAI is getting appealed the suspension decision.
Outside of the abovementioned events the current administration has begun negotiations with Newfoundland, which ended with the recognition of a sum of 300,000 € for 2011, aimed at a public work to For nationals of farm dwellers in Rota, in part recognizing the hardships caused by the landfill to the City of St. John. The agreement specifically states that the construction (design and then construction) Oltrarno the new elementary school, a place of confluence of many children residents in the municipality of Newfoundland and indispensable to those of the district Oltrarno, since the current complex in poor condition and undersized, the potential pool of children it serves. With € 300,000, then, will be made to work by public utility Sangiovannese and people closest to the site of Podere Rota, giving everyone a few more service and better quality. I do not think that other municipalities have had this - call it even minimum - attention.
The fact that the city of Newfoundland contribute to the remaking of the public building of our municipality, means the opportunity for St. John to act on old promises to the citizens of Badiola: the cycle and a compensation to the families of the nuisance from the landfill, which is similar to that enjoyed by people who are within the boundaries terranuovesi. Perhaps mistakenly, I believe the decisions of the satisfactory and better than other proposals such as, for example, the construction of a parking lot, the rain distribution of € 300 thousand, or investment in facilities and activities that belong only CSAI or to the City of Terranova Bracciolini, and not in San Giovanni Valdarno.
That said, I remain convinced that this site in cause of action by politicians, administrators, and environmental that at the end of the eighties have agreed to it in the Park with the promise of the crags that waste "as is", that landfill, accounted for only emergency and that they would soon been replaced by "non-reusable fractions", will continue unfortunately, to be an emergency. Today I am also concerned about the future scenarios laid out by persistent rumors that they see the wad (place of distant memory, that without the emergency would have done its part containing the ashes) as the number one candidate after Podere Rota. Thus, the landfill would move from the east to the west of San Giovanni, with the aggravating circumstance that our municipality would no longer even the possibility of using the interface Province of Arezzo.
I believe, therefore, crucial: 1, the observatory (now established) functions, becoming a place of confrontation and conflict to protect the citizens. 2 ° for people to start thinking about our earth, as to be reclaimed and re-evaluate (see the first landfill in the municipality of Cavriglia south and southwest of San Giovanni), even at the cost of out of fashion choices. 3 ° it will start a serious discussion among politicians, administrators, environmentalists and citizens, so that it becomes a sewer Valdarno of Tuscany, with all the possible inconvenience and no comfort.
0 comments:
Post a Comment